Zina brought up a great topic that obviously had deeper roots than our individual opinions of guitars or bodhrans. I think that question of what "traditional music" is has no easy answers, either for the musicologist or for the casual player or for the non-playing "fan," and in my opinion Comhaltas' determination to be the sole authority on what constitutes ITM all too often causes them to act counterproductively and look silly. With Fleadh Season upon us, I wanted to share this article:
Changing the Rules
Grupaí Cheoil Contest or Ceili Band?
by Terence McKinney
At least in the Midwest in the last few years, there's been a lot of attention directed to the Grupa Cheoil competitions. (For what GC is about, see the right sidebar of the above link.) One year this led to a very obvious and intense argument between two of the adjudicators in front of the assembled audience that delayed the results for several hours, turned the event into a floor for passionate arguments on both sides, and cancelled the rest of the evening's scheduled events. The above editorial refers to what happened the following year, in Ireland. What's interesting about it is that in my understanding, Comhaltas created the competition with an eye to promoting a new kind of traditional music, influenced by the popularity of the Chieftains and Planxty. The story I heard was that sometime after these groups had become popular, Bord Failte approached Comhaltas about starting a competition to encourage a new kind of music based in the tradition but that the tourists would find more familiar and palatable, and that is how the GC competition was born. The rules say nothing prohibiting arranging, and indeed, the understanding on this side of the pond has always been that arranging is expected and that is what is meant by "instrumentation and presentation." Also, there is plenty of room for the solo playing that is at the heart of the tradition; various soloists can take their turns supported by taseful accompaniment and transitions. ("Tasteful" being, of course, a whole other issue, but most basically meaning, not obscuring the melody while it is going on, and contributing to the musical unity of the set as a whole.) That such arranged music has provoked quite severe reactions from a lot of traditionalists seems unsurprising, until you realize that Comhaltas originally accepted GC as a new, totally different, and modern take on ITM. Years later, it appears they're regretting this and dealing with it by refusing to admit they ever approved it in the first place.
In grupai cheoil, the ideal is that the performers are first and formost competent Irish musicians, but for the GC thing to work, they have to have to also have some knowledge of classical, jazz or pop harmony. If they don't, attempting something outside of their realm of comfort can't lead to any but a painful result...and if the adjudicators have no knowledge of anything but ITM, it will be extremely hard for them to judge anything but straight ITM. The American groups tend to have more arrangers and performers with the ability to do arrangements more complex than using one part of one tune as a refrain and switching the instrumentation around; the American judges often have no way of knowing what will be wanted in Ireland. Also, there is a big difference between objecting to an arrangement as untraditional and a way of playing the tune itself (Rhythm, accenting, for ex) as untraditional; compounding the problem is that some American groups, especially Chicago, actually teach little or no Irish music to the students, using players culled from Suzuki or school orchestras as a virtual chamber orchestra under the name of GC. Unless they have already great trad musicians at their disposal, the result will be less than satisfactory since the kids are taught only the parts for the arrangements and can't play with anyone but those from the same "school." Stuff like this gives Americans a bad name generally while missing the point that if the tunes are first and formost played soloistically, allowed to shine supported by interesting, innovative, and tasteful arrangements, is hard to object to on a musical basis. Who knows why CCE has really decided recently to crack down on the whole thing...but unfortunately, it is not hard to speculate. Thoughts, anyone?
Has anyone here heard Tony Ellis and the Musicians of Braeburn? To me they are a Chieftains-like approach to (mainly) traditional Appalachian-type music. (ATM?). Similarly Cauld Blast Orchestra and others have done the same thing in Scotland.
Sorry about the detour from the original topic. But I think that what we have of recordings of traditional musicians in the early days of recording, is all we will have of preserved tradition . (and even those players would have already been exposed to other influences)
Everything else is informed by internationally-available recordings, new instruments, new techniques, and ubiquitous broadcasting of all types of music. It is nobody's duty to preserve the tradition. Where and what the tradition is can only be determined with hindsight and will never adhere to a prescriptive template. Play what you hear in your head and some historian will map the path of tradition through it at a later date.
It seems natural that musicians in a tradition, or perhaps from different traditions, would occasionally get together to work on arrangements and a slightly more formal presentation. I don't see that as any threat to tradition and have enjoyed most of these projects, of which the Chieftains must be the longest running. We all know the individual musicians in such groups can play as freely in a session or solo as anyone.
What is described in the previous post sounds like a whole new genre (MidWest US Grupa Cheoil maybe?) , but so what? It could be something really good in itself.
The sort of dispute described in the link is what happens when you let clubs, committees, competitions and judges run music (or anything) for you. They have their role but it's not a dominant one in the real world.
I will never know if I might have enjoyed this music or not until I hear it. Most of the music I know and love, be it "traditional" or something else, runs outside and beyond this world of clubs and committees.
Huh...that's interesting, Ostrich -- thanks for the link, I've never heard of this particular side of this stuff. Something new to learn every day -- I can't comment, as I've never heard any recordings. I'll have to go looking for stuff on the Web when I've the time.
Anyone ever hear of the bowhouse quintet? A group formed by double bass player .Paul O Driscoll.A live album came out about six years ago.Or that mighty Breton group Archetype? With the great Jacky Mollard as its founder.
Well, I guess it would be a lot easier if we could all hear what this thing is we're talking about! I've been looking for sound clips on the web and very surprisingly have had no luck. The cds I was looking for are St. Louis Irish Arts Vol 1or Vol 2, or Cruinn by the Academy of Irish Music. It's easy to find links to purchase those cds, but not to listen to samples, apparently. If I could figure out a way to post tracks from any f the cds here, I would. I have the Bowhouse Quintet's live album which is largely on the same track as the sort of thing I'm talking about; some of the early Chieftains stuff before they started doing all the collaborations is also similar. I'll keep looking for links and if I can find any I'll post them.
This sort of reminds me of my time playing Old-time fiddle tunes in the southern U.S. I played straight guitar in the classic style--defined largely by one southern gentleman long dead who recorded a couple of records in the late 1920 and early '30s--for a number of years until I just got bored with it (having been seduced by Celtic music). There is even less patience within that community with anyone who tries to push the tradition musically, and there are even those who intensely dislike anyone even from another part of the country who plays "their" music. In short, it's extremely parochial, and the end result can be that the music is so rarified that few people play it, and even less get to hear it.
The additional irony is that much of this style of music wasn't recorded until the 1920s, and that many of its current practitioners play it in the style of those early recordings. To be fair, there are some bands that have really pushed the limits, but they don't come from the Sunny South of the USA--they're mostly YANKEES, gawd forbid.
Perhaps another thing to keep in mind is that when you make the deal that folk traditions are going to be kept alive by institutions, rather than just folks, you have to realize that institutions are by their very nature conservative by nature as a function of self-preservation. Comhaltas may play a very important role in the preservation and dissemination of ITM, but it is what? 50-60 years old?
Really, Stevie! I had no idea that the Old Time folks could be snobby as well. And here's me thinking they're such a paramount of virtuous diversity... ;) I don't know why I thought that, I suppose people are people no matter where you go or what you play.
Zina, many of these people can be quite snobby about their chosen art form. As with all forms of music, the best players can be quite charming and open-minded, but even then they can also be very opinionated, even chauvinistic. An acquaintence of mine who is a very well-regarded fiddler of SE regional tunes practically spat nails when he learned that another fiddler from the NE US who is internationally known in old-time music and song was coming to town to play a concert and dance. Something along the lines of "damn yankees coming down here to show us how to play OUR music!" Oh man, don't get me started on their fondness for workboots, old instruments, rosiny fiddletops, snake rattles, even choice of whiskeys. They're just as fancified and discerning in their own way as the most delicately Celtic-knotted, wool-wearing, Guinness-quaffing ITM enthusiast.
It's human nature, all right, in all its grubby glory!
I agree with our Aussie friend Bren...(yay for thew freedom of downunder) .......clubs and committiees can get in the way of the heart of the thing, kindalike th Pope gets in the way of the spirit of the thing............organized music and religion be damned. up with anarchy! I never get more pleasure than when I play freely at my sesions, for nobody in particular and with nothing in mind..........
Hi there, first post so forgive me if I'm not quite up to speed. I have been playing Irish music for many years now and have competed many times at the Fleadhs. Every year I see the music and the sarcred 'tradition' evolving into many other things, some good, some bad. Even when traveling to Ireland for the Fleadh there about a week ago, the music was very different. There is a different air about it these days. While pretty much styles are staying the same, there seems to be more to just playing the tunes anymore. I believe that it is regarded more along the lines as Art. Someone had mentioned the St. Louis Arts and the Academy of Irish Music groups earlier and I acutally had the opportunity to hear tracks from both groups, and I have to say, esp. with Cruinn (by the Academy of Irish Music) they are quite evolved and perhaps a more modern style of Irish music than has ever come about. The same idea is applied to more well-known groups such as Lunasa or Solas, even older Cheiftan recordings.
As for the Fleadh Cheoil in America, Ireland and where ever else as far as the musicality is concerned, I can only really say one thing. St. Louis Arts won the Grupa Cheoil competition last week in Clommel.
"Celtic Chamber Music" and Traditional Music
"Celtic Chamber Music" and Traditional Music
Hi All,
Zina brought up a great topic that obviously had deeper roots than our individual opinions of guitars or bodhrans. I think that question of what "traditional music" is has no easy answers, either for the musicologist or for the casual player or for the non-playing "fan," and in my opinion Comhaltas' determination to be the sole authority on what constitutes ITM all too often causes them to act counterproductively and look silly. With Fleadh Season upon us, I wanted to share this article:
Changing the Rules
Grupaí Cheoil Contest or Ceili Band?
by Terence McKinney
here's the link:
http://www.speedlink.net/~cara/cce/2000/08_00_enniscorthy2000/editorial_090500.html
At least in the Midwest in the last few years, there's been a lot of attention directed to the Grupa Cheoil competitions. (For what GC is about, see the right sidebar of the above link.) One year this led to a very obvious and intense argument between two of the adjudicators in front of the assembled audience that delayed the results for several hours, turned the event into a floor for passionate arguments on both sides, and cancelled the rest of the evening's scheduled events. The above editorial refers to what happened the following year, in Ireland. What's interesting about it is that in my understanding, Comhaltas created the competition with an eye to promoting a new kind of traditional music, influenced by the popularity of the Chieftains and Planxty. The story I heard was that sometime after these groups had become popular, Bord Failte approached Comhaltas about starting a competition to encourage a new kind of music based in the tradition but that the tourists would find more familiar and palatable, and that is how the GC competition was born. The rules say nothing prohibiting arranging, and indeed, the understanding on this side of the pond has always been that arranging is expected and that is what is meant by "instrumentation and presentation." Also, there is plenty of room for the solo playing that is at the heart of the tradition; various soloists can take their turns supported by taseful accompaniment and transitions. ("Tasteful" being, of course, a whole other issue, but most basically meaning, not obscuring the melody while it is going on, and contributing to the musical unity of the set as a whole.) That such arranged music has provoked quite severe reactions from a lot of traditionalists seems unsurprising, until you realize that Comhaltas originally accepted GC as a new, totally different, and modern take on ITM. Years later, it appears they're regretting this and dealing with it by refusing to admit they ever approved it in the first place.
In grupai cheoil, the ideal is that the performers are first and formost competent Irish musicians, but for the GC thing to work, they have to have to also have some knowledge of classical, jazz or pop harmony. If they don't, attempting something outside of their realm of comfort can't lead to any but a painful result...and if the adjudicators have no knowledge of anything but ITM, it will be extremely hard for them to judge anything but straight ITM. The American groups tend to have more arrangers and performers with the ability to do arrangements more complex than using one part of one tune as a refrain and switching the instrumentation around; the American judges often have no way of knowing what will be wanted in Ireland. Also, there is a big difference between objecting to an arrangement as untraditional and a way of playing the tune itself (Rhythm, accenting, for ex) as untraditional; compounding the problem is that some American groups, especially Chicago, actually teach little or no Irish music to the students, using players culled from Suzuki or school orchestras as a virtual chamber orchestra under the name of GC. Unless they have already great trad musicians at their disposal, the result will be less than satisfactory since the kids are taught only the parts for the arrangements and can't play with anyone but those from the same "school." Stuff like this gives Americans a bad name generally while missing the point that if the tunes are first and formost played soloistically, allowed to shine supported by interesting, innovative, and tasteful arrangements, is hard to object to on a musical basis. Who knows why CCE has really decided recently to crack down on the whole thing...but unfortunately, it is not hard to speculate. Thoughts, anyone?
# Posted on April 6th 2004 by ostrichfeathers
Re: "Celtic Chamber Music" and Traditional Music
Has anyone here heard Tony Ellis and the Musicians of Braeburn? To me they are a Chieftains-like approach to (mainly) traditional Appalachian-type music. (ATM?). Similarly Cauld Blast Orchestra and others have done the same thing in Scotland.
Sorry about the detour from the original topic. But I think that what we have of recordings of traditional musicians in the early days of recording, is all we will have of preserved tradition . (and even those players would have already been exposed to other influences)
Everything else is informed by internationally-available recordings, new instruments, new techniques, and ubiquitous broadcasting of all types of music. It is nobody's duty to preserve the tradition. Where and what the tradition is can only be determined with hindsight and will never adhere to a prescriptive template. Play what you hear in your head and some historian will map the path of tradition through it at a later date.
It seems natural that musicians in a tradition, or perhaps from different traditions, would occasionally get together to work on arrangements and a slightly more formal presentation. I don't see that as any threat to tradition and have enjoyed most of these projects, of which the Chieftains must be the longest running. We all know the individual musicians in such groups can play as freely in a session or solo as anyone.
What is described in the previous post sounds like a whole new genre (MidWest US Grupa Cheoil maybe?) , but so what? It could be something really good in itself.
The sort of dispute described in the link is what happens when you let clubs, committees, competitions and judges run music (or anything) for you. They have their role but it's not a dominant one in the real world.
I will never know if I might have enjoyed this music or not until I hear it. Most of the music I know and love, be it "traditional" or something else, runs outside and beyond this world of clubs and committees.
# Posted on April 6th 2004 by Bren
Re: "Celtic Chamber Music" and Traditional Music
Huh...that's interesting, Ostrich -- thanks for the link, I've never heard of this particular side of this stuff. Something new to learn every day -- I can't comment, as I've never heard any recordings. I'll have to go looking for stuff on the Web when I've the time.
# Posted on April 7th 2004 by Zina Lee
Re: "Celtic Chamber Music" and Traditional Music
Anyone ever hear of the bowhouse quintet? A group formed by double bass player .Paul O Driscoll.A live album came out about six years ago.Or that mighty Breton group Archetype? With the great Jacky Mollard as its founder.
# Posted on April 7th 2004 by downey
Re: "Celtic Chamber Music" and Traditional Music
Well, I guess it would be a lot easier if we could all hear what this thing is we're talking about! I've been looking for sound clips on the web and very surprisingly have had no luck. The cds I was looking for are St. Louis Irish Arts Vol 1or Vol 2, or Cruinn by the Academy of Irish Music. It's easy to find links to purchase those cds, but not to listen to samples, apparently. If I could figure out a way to post tracks from any f the cds here, I would. I have the Bowhouse Quintet's live album which is largely on the same track as the sort of thing I'm talking about; some of the early Chieftains stuff before they started doing all the collaborations is also similar. I'll keep looking for links and if I can find any I'll post them.
# Posted on April 7th 2004 by ostrichfeathers
Re: "Celtic Chamber Music" and Traditional Music
This sort of reminds me of my time playing Old-time fiddle tunes in the southern U.S. I played straight guitar in the classic style--defined largely by one southern gentleman long dead who recorded a couple of records in the late 1920 and early '30s--for a number of years until I just got bored with it (having been seduced by Celtic music). There is even less patience within that community with anyone who tries to push the tradition musically, and there are even those who intensely dislike anyone even from another part of the country who plays "their" music. In short, it's extremely parochial, and the end result can be that the music is so rarified that few people play it, and even less get to hear it.
The additional irony is that much of this style of music wasn't recorded until the 1920s, and that many of its current practitioners play it in the style of those early recordings. To be fair, there are some bands that have really pushed the limits, but they don't come from the Sunny South of the USA--they're mostly YANKEES, gawd forbid.
Perhaps another thing to keep in mind is that when you make the deal that folk traditions are going to be kept alive by institutions, rather than just folks, you have to realize that institutions are by their very nature conservative by nature as a function of self-preservation. Comhaltas may play a very important role in the preservation and dissemination of ITM, but it is what? 50-60 years old?
# Posted on April 9th 2004 by Audeamus
Re: "Celtic Chamber Music" and Traditional Music
Really, Stevie! I had no idea that the Old Time folks could be snobby as well. And here's me thinking they're such a paramount of virtuous diversity... ;) I don't know why I thought that, I suppose people are people no matter where you go or what you play.
# Posted on April 9th 2004 by Zina Lee
Re: "Celtic Chamber Music" and Traditional Music
Zina, many of these people can be quite snobby about their chosen art form. As with all forms of music, the best players can be quite charming and open-minded, but even then they can also be very opinionated, even chauvinistic. An acquaintence of mine who is a very well-regarded fiddler of SE regional tunes practically spat nails when he learned that another fiddler from the NE US who is internationally known in old-time music and song was coming to town to play a concert and dance. Something along the lines of "damn yankees coming down here to show us how to play OUR music!" Oh man, don't get me started on their fondness for workboots, old instruments, rosiny fiddletops, snake rattles, even choice of whiskeys. They're just as fancified and discerning in their own way as the most delicately Celtic-knotted, wool-wearing, Guinness-quaffing ITM enthusiast.
It's human nature, all right, in all its grubby glory!
# Posted on April 9th 2004 by Audeamus
Re: "Celtic Chamber Music" and Traditional Music
I agree with our Aussie friend Bren...(yay for thew freedom of downunder) .......clubs and committiees can get in the way of the heart of the thing, kindalike th Pope gets in the way of the spirit of the thing............organized music and religion be damned. up with anarchy! I never get more pleasure than when I play freely at my sesions, for nobody in particular and with nothing in mind..........
# Posted on April 9th 2004 by vboyd100
Re: "Celtic Chamber Music" and Traditional Music
Hi there, first post so forgive me if I'm not quite up to speed. I have been playing Irish music for many years now and have competed many times at the Fleadhs. Every year I see the music and the sarcred 'tradition' evolving into many other things, some good, some bad. Even when traveling to Ireland for the Fleadh there about a week ago, the music was very different. There is a different air about it these days. While pretty much styles are staying the same, there seems to be more to just playing the tunes anymore. I believe that it is regarded more along the lines as Art. Someone had mentioned the St. Louis Arts and the Academy of Irish Music groups earlier and I acutally had the opportunity to hear tracks from both groups, and I have to say, esp. with Cruinn (by the Academy of Irish Music) they are quite evolved and perhaps a more modern style of Irish music than has ever come about. The same idea is applied to more well-known groups such as Lunasa or Solas, even older Cheiftan recordings.
As for the Fleadh Cheoil in America, Ireland and where ever else as far as the musicality is concerned, I can only really say one thing. St. Louis Arts won the Grupa Cheoil competition last week in Clommel.
# Posted on September 1st 2004 by Gus Gus